Show the disclosure
Tell the recipient about the AI interaction or label AI-generated content where the requirement applies.
Compliance frameworks / EU AI Act
Connect AI obligations to the decisions behind them.
Bring together authority, oversight, and disclosure records so an AI Act review starts with evidence of what happened.
AI regulation
Selected catalog mappingsCatalog 2026.09.2
Start with the system’s role and risk.
The EU AI Act takes a risk-based approach. Obligations depend on the AI system, its use, and whether your organization acts as a provider, deployer, or another regulated actor. Selected evidence mappings support that review; they do not determine which obligations apply.
Make transparency part of the record.
When disclosure recording is enabled on supported surfaces, AI-interaction notices and content labels can leave a receipt connected to the organization’s history.
Explore agent governanceRecord the event
A supported disclosure event can record the surface and subject reference without copying the conversation into the receipt.
Review the evidence
The disclosure receipt maps to Article 50 in the control catalog. Reviewers still assess the notice, delivery, and applicable duty.
Inspect the selected AI Act mappings.
These references describe the product’s advisory crosswalk. Evidence depends on the recorded activity, configured capabilities, and review window.
Catalog referenceProduct evidenceReview limits
Article 12
Product evidenceChained action receipts provide logging and traceability records.
Review limitsThe record covers captured activity. It does not establish complete logging for every AI system.
Article 14
Product evidenceHeld, denied, or abstained actions and human-decided gates provide oversight records.
Review limitsObservation after execution cannot evidence an intervention before execution.
Article 26
Product evidenceRegistered-agent attribution and scoped conformance packets support record review.
Review limitsA packet is one part of a deployer’s obligations, not a determination that they have all been met.
Article 50
Product evidenceSupported AI-interaction and content-label disclosures can be recorded as receipts.
Review limitsDisclosure recording requires configuration. A receipt alone does not validate wording, delivery, or legal sufficiency.
Catalog 2026.09.2. A selected mapping supports evidence review; it does not establish compliance or certification.
Keep applicability with the people responsible for it.
Use the record alongside your legal and technical assessment of the AI system and its actual use.
- 01
System classification, intended purpose, and organizational role
- 02
Applicable obligations and current implementation dates
- 03
Technical documentation, risk controls, and disclosure design
Questions about EU AI Act?
Does this make an AI system compliant with the Act?
No. Selected catalog mappings connect records to references in the Act. Legal applicability, risk classification, complete technical controls, and any required conformity assessment need a separate review.
Are Article 50 disclosures recorded everywhere?
No. Recording must be enabled and the interaction must pass through a supported disclosure surface. A label added elsewhere does not automatically become a recorded disclosure.
Can imported agent logs prove human oversight?
Imported activity can show what was observed. It cannot establish that an action was held or reviewed before it took effect. The packet keeps that distinction visible.
Read the primary references.
Framework requirements and their interpretation should be checked against the authoritative source.
Bring your AI Act evidence questions into focus.
Walk through the scope, available evidence, and remaining requirements with our team.